000 05996cam a2200529 i 4500
001 ocn956320387
003 OCoLC
005 20250612155437.0
006 m o d
007 cr mn|||||||||
008 160808t20162016mau ob 001 0 eng d
040 _aOPELS
_beng
_erda
_epn
_cOPELS
_dEBLCP
_dOCLCF
_dOCLCA
_dOSU
_dDEBBG
_dMERUC
_dUMI
_dTOH
_dSTF
_dYDX
_dFEM
_dIDEBK
_dYDXCP
_dDEBSZ
_dCOO
_dOCLCQ
_dN$T
_dS4S
_dIDB
_dOCLCQ
_dU3W
_dUOK
_dCEF
_dKSU
_dOCLCQ
_dNLE
_dINT
_dUKMGB
_dWYU
_dOCLCQ
_dNLW
_dOCLCQ
_dS2H
_dOCLCO
_dOCLCQ
_dOCLCO
_dOCLCL
_dSXB
_dOCLCQ
_dOCLCO
_dOCLCL
016 7 _a018072370
_2Uk
019 _a954194828
_a961332379
_a965759358
_a968107365
_a968998877
020 _a9780081005897
_q(electronic bk.)
020 _a008100589X
_q(electronic bk.)
020 _z9780081005927
_q(print)
020 _z008100592X
_q(print)
035 _a(OCoLC)956320387
_z(OCoLC)954194828
_z(OCoLC)961332379
_z(OCoLC)965759358
_z(OCoLC)968107365
_z(OCoLC)968998877
050 4 _aQ179.97
072 7 _aSCI
_x000000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a502.85
_223
_1https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ddc/E34jryQYJ6kMvx3BQ7rrD8mPQT
100 1 _aOrtega, Jos�e Luis,
_eauthor.
_1https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCjHjYPCkBxRMDWG9GyQPBd
_933862
245 1 0 _aSocial network sites for scientists :
_ba quantitative survey /
_cJos�e Luis Ortega.
264 1 _aCambridge, MA :
_bChandos Publishing is an imprint of Elsevier,
_c[2016]
264 4 _c�2016
300 _a1 online resource (xv, 182 pages)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
490 1 _aChandos information professional series
520 _aSocial Network Sites for Scientists: A Quantitative Survey explores the newest social network sites (for example, ResearchGate and Academia.edu) and web bibliographic platforms (Mendeley, Zotero) that have recently emerged for the scholarly community to use in the interchange of information and documents. Chapters describe their main characteristics, what their advantages and limitations are, and the researchers that populate these websites. The surveys included in the book have been conducted following a quantitative approach, and measure the strength of the services provided by the sites in terms of use and activity. In addition, they also discuss the implications of new products in the future of scientific communication and their impact on research activities and evaluation.
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 _a1 Introduction; 1.1 The Web and the Web 2.0 Concept; 1.2 Social Networking Sites -- The Web of the People; 1.3 Open Access -- Toward a New Scientific Communication; 1.4 Almetrics -- The Social Impact of Science; 1.5 Social Network Sites for Scientists; 1.5.1 Definition; 1.5.2 Functions; 1.5.3 Motivations and Adoption; 1.5.4 Typology; 1.5.5 Business Models; 1.6 Methods; 1.6.1 Scope; 1.6.2 Indicators; 1.6.2.1 Activity; 1.6.2.2 Compound Annual Growth Rate.
505 8 _a1.6.2.3 Country Penetration1.6.2.4 Country Spreading; 1.6.2.5 Recent Activity; 1.6.3 Sources; 1.6.4 Data Extraction; Note; References; 2 The First Attempts; 2.1 Nature Network; 2.1.1 A Wide Range of Contacting Tools; 2.1.1.1 Forums; 2.1.1.2 Groups; 2.1.1.3 Hubs; 2.1.1.4 Blogs; 2.1.1.5 Questions & Answers; 2.1.1.6 Workbench; 2.1.2 The Natural Community; 2.1.3 The Chatting Room; 2.2 BiomedExperts; 2.2.1 Scientist's Directory; 2.2.2 Interaction Tools; 2.2.3 Structure; 2.2.4 Pre-elaborated Profiles; 2.2.5 UniPHY: The Physics Sequel; 2.2.6 A Static Network of Automatic Profiles.
505 8 _a2.3 Why did these Sites Fail?References; 3 Social Bookmarking Sites; 3.1 CiteULike; 3.1.1 A Decayed Database; 3.1.2 Building a Social Library; 3.1.2.1 Tags; 3.1.2.2 Groups; 3.1.3 A Community in Decline; 3.1.4 Research Fields; 3.1.5 The Decay of an Extended Service; 3.2 BibSonomy; 3.2.1 Coverage, a user Called DBLP; 3.2.2 The German Club; 3.2.3 Social Dimension; 3.2.3.1 The BibSonomy's Meeting Point; 3.2.3.2 Tabs, Linking Documents; 3.2.4 A Local Project; 3.3 The Social Benefit of Egoism; Note; References; 4 Reference Management Tools; 4.1 Mendeley; 4.1.1 Desktop App.
505 8 _a4.1.2 The Crowdsourced Catalogue4.1.3 The Social Network; 4.1.3.1 Tags or Keywords?; 4.1.3.2 Profiles, the Students' Network; 4.1.3.3 Groups, the Readers' Club; 4.1.4 Discovering Recommended Papers; 4.2 Zotero; 4.2.1 References in the Cloud; 4.2.1.1 Profiles, Just a Calling Card; 4.2.1.2 Groups, the Only Way of Sharing; 4.2.2 Open Source, Close Content; 4.3 Could a Reference Manager be a Social Site?; References; 5 Document Sharing Services; 5.1 ResearchGate; 5.1.1 Metrics, Tracking the User Actions; 5.1.1.1 RG Score; 5.1.1.2 Impact Points; 5.1.1.3 Citations; 5.1.1.4 Publications.
505 8 _a5.1.1.5 Views5.1.1.6 Downloads; 5.1.1.7 Followers/followings; 5.1.2 Organizations, Beyond the Personal Profiles; 5.1.3 Publications, Self-archiving Driving Force; 5.1.4 Profiles, a Balanced Scientific Community; 5.1.5 Questions & Answers, a Forum Concealed by Questions; 5.1.6 More than a Social Network; 5.2 Academia.edu; 5.2.1 Profiles, the Humanists Network; 5.2.2 Papers, an Unstructured Ragbag; 5.2.3 Research Interests, Tagging the Content; 5.2.4 Viewers or Producers Network?; 5.3 Towards the Complete Academic Networking Site; References; 6 Comparison; 6.1 Size, Searching the Critical Mass.
588 0 _aPrint version record.
650 0 _aScience
_xComputer network resources.
_933863
650 0 _aOnline social networks.
758 _ihas work:
_aSocial network sites for scientists (Text)
_1https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGYtCbBQkfRmXyKPvDjxTb
_4https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_nDruck-Ausgabe
_aOrtega, Jose Luis. Social Network Sites for Scientists .
_tA Quantitative Survey
830 0 _aChandos information professional series.
856 4 0 _3ScienceDirect
_uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780081005927
999 _c216364
_d216364