000			00393nam a2200133Ia 4500
999			_c171527 _d171527
020			_a9780262195614 (vol. 1 : hardcover : alk. paper)
040			_cCUS
082			_a170 _bSIN/M
245		0	_aMoral psychology/ _cedited by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong.
260			_aCambridge, _bMIT, _cc2008.
300			_a3 v. _bPB
505			_aContents Acknowledgments xi Introduction xiil Walter Sinnott-Armstrong 1 I Naturalizing Ethics 1 Owen Flanagan, Hagop Sarkissian, and David Wong 1.1 I Three Cheers for Naturalistic Ethics 27 William D. Casebeer 1.2 I Response to Duke Naturalists Michael Ruse 1.3 I Naturalism Relativized? Peter Railton 37 33 1.4 I What Is the Nature of Morality? A Response to Casebeer, Railton, and Ruse 45 ' Owen Flanagan, Hagop Sarklssian, and David Wong 2 I Can a General Deontic Logic Capture the Facts of Human Moral Reasoning? How the Mind Interprets Social Exchange Rules and Detects Cheaters 53 Leda Cosmides and john Tooby 2.1 I Ought We to Abandon a Domain-General Treatment of "Ought"? 121 Ron Mallon 2.2 I Can Evolutionary Psychology Assist Logicians? A Reply to Mallon 131 Leda Cosmides and john Tooby 'i vili I Contents 2.3 Comment on Cosmides and Tooby 137 Jerry Fodorjerry rouui 2.4 When Falsification Strikes: A Reply to Fodor 143 Leda Cosmides and John Tooby Moral Sentiments Reiating to incest: Discerning Adaptations from By-products 165 Debra Lleberman 3.1 , Edward Westermarck on the Meaning of "Morai" Arthur P. WolfArthur P. won , u c 195 3.2 : Aversions, Sentiments, Moral judgments, and Taboos Richard Joyce 3.3 ; Response to Joyce and Woif 205 Debra Lieberman Kindness, Fidelity, and Other Sexually Selected Virtues 209 Geoffrey MillerGeoffrey Miller 4.1 I Why Moral Virtues Are Probably Not Sexual Adaptahons Catherine Driscoll i-auiciiii^ 4.2 ^ The conflict-Resolution Theory of Virtue Oliver Curry 4.3 ! Response to Comments 263 Geoffrey Miller Peter Ulric TsePeter Ulric Tse 299 Michael R. Dietrich Tse 303 Kathleen Wallace 5 3 Reply to Dietrich and Wallace 315 Peter Ulric Tse ,ci w •• • - Structure That Shapes Chandra Sekhar Sripada 6.1 Gilbe 6.2 John 6.3 Chan Using a Linguistic Analogy to Study Morality rt Harman |The Poverty of the Moral Stimulus Mikhail Reply to Harman and Mikhail dra Sekhar Sripada 7 Is Morality Innate? 367 Jesse '• Prinz 361 353 7.1 ' I low Not to Argue That Morality Isn't Innate: Comments on Prinz Susan 407 Dwyer 7.2 I "she Nativism Debate and Moral Philosophy: Comments on Prinz I 419 Valeri^Tiberius 7.3 I f^ply to Dwyer and Tiberius 427 Jesse J.lPrinz Referen Contrib ;es 441 itors 497 Index tcj Volume 1 Index tcjVolume 2 Index to Volume 3 '"*1 I'M. !! 499 527 557 345 Contents ix 6.1 I Using a Linguistic Analogy to Study Morality 345 Gilbert Harman 6.2 j The Poverty of the Moral Stimulus 353 John Mikhail 6.3 ' Reply to Harman and Mikhail 361 Chandra Sekhar Sripada 7 I Is Morality Innate? 367 Jesse J. Prinz 7.1 I How Not to Argue That Morality Isn't Innate: Comments on Prinz 407 Susan Dwyer 7.2 I The Nativism Debate and Moral Philosophy: Comments on Prinz 419 Valerie Tiberius 7.3 I Reply to Dwyer and Tiberius 427 Jesse J. Prinz References 441 Contributors 497 Index to Volume 1 499 Index to Volume 2 527 Index to Volume 3 557
942			_cWB16